中国组织工程研究 ›› 2020, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (17): 2782-2788.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2574

• 组织构建循证医学 evidence-based medicine in tissue construction • 上一篇    

不同形式运动对原发性骨质疏松患者骨代谢指标影响的Meta分析

袁秋宝,孔海军   

  1. 喀什大学体育学院,新疆维吾尔自治区喀什市  844006
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-21 修回日期:2019-01-02 接受日期:2019-04-15 出版日期:2020-06-18 发布日期:2020-03-30
  • 作者简介:袁秋宝,男,1982年生,湖北省蕲春县人,汉族,2007年湖北大学毕业,硕士,讲师,主要从事体育教育训练学研究。

Meta-analysis of bone metabolism indicators in patients with primary osteoporosis under different forms of exercises 

Yuan Qiubao, Kong Haijun   

  1. Kashgar University Sports School, Kashar 844006, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China
  • Received:2018-12-21 Revised:2019-01-02 Accepted:2019-04-15 Online:2020-06-18 Published:2020-03-30
  • About author:Yuan Qiubao, Master, Lecturer, Kashgar University Sports School, Kashar 844006, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China

摘要:

文题释义:

原发性骨质疏松:骨质疏松症是最常见的骨骼疾病,是一种以骨量低,骨组织微结构损坏,导致骨脆性增加,易发生骨折为特征的全身性骨病。骨质疏松症分为原发性和继发性两大类。原发性骨质疏松症包括绝经后骨质疏松症(Ⅰ型)、老年骨质疏松症(Ⅱ型)和特发性骨质疏松症(包括青少年型)。

体育锻炼:是指参加者通过重要性的身体运动,以增强体质、增进健康为目的的体力活动。诸多研究证实,体育锻炼对原发性骨质疏松有一定效果,但其作用方式、具体作用效果并不明确。

背景:体育锻炼对骨质疏松症患者骨量丢失、疼痛及骨代谢指标均有明显改善作用,但尚缺乏循证依据。

目的:系统评价不同体育运动对原发性骨质疏松患者治疗效果的干预作用。

方法:筛选体育运动与原发性骨质疏松患者治疗效果的临床随机对照试验,干预组以体育锻炼为主,对照组试验期间无规律运动,主要结局指标为腰椎L2-L4骨密度、疼痛目测类比评分、骨代谢指标(骨钙素、总Ⅰ型胶原氨基端延长肽、尿吡啶啉/肌酐、血钙、血磷)。采用Review Manager 5.3软件对纳入的结局指标进行Meta分析。

结果与结论:①总计纳入25篇随机对照试验研究;②Meta分析结果显示,体育锻炼可以有效提高原发性骨质疏松患者L2-L4骨密度(MD=0.06,95%CI:0.04-0.08,P < 0.000 01,I2=89%),亚组分析结果为:五禽戏-易筋经、健身操组、复合训练组、递增负荷训练组与对照组比较差异均有显著性意义(P < 0.05),其他运动组与对照组比较差异无显著性意义(P > 0.05);③体育锻炼可显著降低骨质疏松症患者疼痛程度(MD=-0.93,95% CI:-1.08至-0.79,P < 0.000 01,I2=83%);④运动干预可提高骨质疏松症患者血清骨钙素、总Ⅰ型胶原氨基端延长肽及血磷水平,并降低骨质疏松症患者尿吡啶啉及血钙水平,但各运动组与对照组比较差异均无显著性意义(P > 0.05);⑤Egger’s及Begg’s检验结果表明,纳入研究发表偏倚处于低水平;结果提示,体育运动对中老年原发性骨质疏松症患者的骨密度、疼痛具有显著干预作用。

中国组织工程研究杂志出版内容重点:组织构建;骨细胞;软骨细胞;细胞培养;成纤维细胞;血管内皮细胞;骨质疏松组织工程

关键词: 体育锻炼, 原发性骨质疏松, 骨密度, 疼痛, 骨代谢, 随机对照试验

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: Physical exercise can significantly reduce bone mass loss, relieve pain and improve bone metabolism in osteoporosis patients, but there is no evidence-based evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different physical exercises on the treatment of primary osteoporosis.

METHODS: Randomized controlled clinical trials regarding the therapeutic effect of physical exercise on primary osteoporosis were screened. The physical exercise group was subjected to physical exercise, and the control group had no regular exercise during the test. The main outcome measures included bone mineral density of lumbar spine L2-L4, visual analog scale score, bone metabolism index (osteocalcin, total type 1 procollagen amino terminal peptide, urine pyridinium/creatinine, blood calcium, blood phosphorus). The included outcome indicators were meta-analyzed using the Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: A total of 25 randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis results showed that physical exercise could effectively improve the bone mineral density of L2-L4 segments in primary osteoporosis patients (mean difference=0.06, 95% confidence interval [0.04-0.08], P < 0.000 01, I2=89%). Subgroup analysis results revealed significant differences in the control group and five-animal exercise & Yi-Jin-Jing group, setting-up exercise group, composite exercise group, and incremental exercise group compared with control group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference between other exercise groups and control group (P > 0.05). Physical exercise significantly reduced the pain as determined by the visual analog scale in osteoporosis patients (mean difference=-0.93, 95% confidence interval [-1.08 to -0.79], P < 0.000 01, I2=83%). Exercise intervention could improve serum osteocalcin, total type 1 procollagen amino terminal peptide and blood phosphorus levels, and reduce urine pyridinium/creatinine and serum calcium levels. However, there was no significant difference between exercise groups and control group (P > 0.05). The results of Egger’s and Begg’s tests indicated that publication bias of the included studies was at a low level. All these findings indicate that physical exercise has significant interventional effects on bone mineral density and pain in patients with primary osteoporosis.

Key words: physical exercise, primary osteoporosis, bone mineral density, pain, bone metabolism, randomized controlled trial

中图分类号: